Wisconsin Court
Reinstates Law on Union Rights
Published: June 14, 2011 - New York Times
The Wisconsin Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for significant cuts
to collective bargaining rights for public workers in the state, undoing a lower
courtfs decision that Wisconsinfs controversial law had been passed improperly.
The Supreme Courtfs ruling,
issued at the close of the business day, spared lawmakers in the
Republican-dominated Capitol from having to do what some of them strongly hoped
to avoid: calling for a new vote on the polarizing collective bargaining
measure, which had drawn tens of thousands of protesters to Madison this year
and led Democratic lawmakers to flee the city in an effort to block the bill.
Republican leaders had warned on Monday that if the Supreme Court did not
rule by Tuesday, they would feel compelled to attach the same measure to the
statefs budget bill, which is expected to be approved this week.
Four months after the fight began, the decision ended, at least for now,
lingering questions about when and whether the cuts would take effect, but it
also underscored the statefs partisan divide, which seems to grow wider by the
day. The ruling was 4 to 3, split along what many viewed as the courtfs
predictable conservative-liberal line. One of the dissenting justices even
raised the specter of a gpartisan slanth by the other side.
The majority of the justices concluded that a lower court was wrong when it
found that the Legislature had forced through the cuts in collective bargaining
without giving sufficient notice — 24 hours — under the statefs open-meetings
requirements. The measure passed in early March, three weeks after the State
Senatefs Democrats fled to Illinois to block the vote from occurring.
In its written decision, the court cited the importance of the separation of
powers, and said the Legislature had not violated the statefs Constitution when
it relied on its ginterpretation of its own rules of proceedingh and gave
slightly less than two hoursf notice before meeting and voting. In the end, the
provision passed without the attendance of any of the Senatefs 14 Democrats.
Justice David T. Prosser, whose re-election bid was threatened this year
because he was seen as a conservative who would cast the deciding vote on the
collective bargaining measure if it came before the court, voted to
overturn the lower court ruling. He issued his own opinion concurring with the
majority.
Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, who is viewed by many as leading the
courtfs liberal wing, wrote a scathing opinion that accused the majority of a
ghasty judgment.h
gIt is long on rhetoric and long on story-telling that appears to have a
partisan slant,h Chief Justice Abrahamson wrote of Justice Prosserfs opinion,
later adding, gThis kind of order seems to open the court unnecessarily to the
charge that the majority has reached a pre-determined conclusion not based on
the facts and the law, which undermines the majorityfs ultimate decision.h
Republicans, who won control of both legislative chambers and the governorfs
office in last Novemberfs elections, praised the ruling, and said they could now
move forward with what some of them describe as a fiscally wise budget.
gThe Supreme Courtfs ruling provides our state the opportunity to move
forward together and focus on getting Wisconsin working again,h Gov. Scott
Walker said.
Scott and Jeff Fitzgerald — brothers and Republican leaders in the
Legislature — issued a statement describing the ruling as unsurprising. gWe
followed the law when the bill was passed, simple as that,h they said.
Democrats said the courtfs decision was unsurprising given a battle that has
turned so fierce. Protesters, again, were mounting at the Capitol. Democratic
leaders said they planned to remind voters of the collective bargaining bill in
the weeks before Senate recall elections that grew out of the fight.
gI guarantee you, some Republicans are breathing a sigh of relief about not
having to take this up again,h said Senator Christopher Larson, a Democrat. gOn
the other hand, these justices just sent a reminder to voters of what has
happened here.h