Wisconsin Court Reinstates Law on Union Rights

Published: June 14, 2011 - New York Times

The Wisconsin Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for significant cuts to collective bargaining rights for public workers in the state, undoing a lower courtfs decision that Wisconsinfs controversial law had been passed improperly.

The Supreme Courtfs ruling, issued at the close of the business day, spared lawmakers in the Republican-dominated Capitol from having to do what some of them strongly hoped to avoid: calling for a new vote on the polarizing collective bargaining measure, which had drawn tens of thousands of protesters to Madison this year and led Democratic lawmakers to flee the city in an effort to block the bill.

Republican leaders had warned on Monday that if the Supreme Court did not rule by Tuesday, they would feel compelled to attach the same measure to the statefs budget bill, which is expected to be approved this week.

Four months after the fight began, the decision ended, at least for now, lingering questions about when and whether the cuts would take effect, but it also underscored the statefs partisan divide, which seems to grow wider by the day. The ruling was 4 to 3, split along what many viewed as the courtfs predictable conservative-liberal line. One of the dissenting justices even raised the specter of a gpartisan slanth by the other side.

The majority of the justices concluded that a lower court was wrong when it found that the Legislature had forced through the cuts in collective bargaining without giving sufficient notice — 24 hours — under the statefs open-meetings requirements. The measure passed in early March, three weeks after the State Senatefs Democrats fled to Illinois to block the vote from occurring.

In its written decision, the court cited the importance of the separation of powers, and said the Legislature had not violated the statefs Constitution when it relied on its ginterpretation of its own rules of proceedingh and gave slightly less than two hoursf notice before meeting and voting. In the end, the provision passed without the attendance of any of the Senatefs 14 Democrats.

Justice David T. Prosser, whose re-election bid was threatened this year because he was seen as a conservative who would cast the deciding vote on the collective bargaining measure if it came before the court, voted to overturn the lower court ruling. He issued his own opinion concurring with the majority.

Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, who is viewed by many as leading the courtfs liberal wing, wrote a scathing opinion that accused the majority of a ghasty judgment.h

gIt is long on rhetoric and long on story-telling that appears to have a partisan slant,h Chief Justice Abrahamson wrote of Justice Prosserfs opinion, later adding, gThis kind of order seems to open the court unnecessarily to the charge that the majority has reached a pre-determined conclusion not based on the facts and the law, which undermines the majorityfs ultimate decision.h

Republicans, who won control of both legislative chambers and the governorfs office in last Novemberfs elections, praised the ruling, and said they could now move forward with what some of them describe as a fiscally wise budget.

gThe Supreme Courtfs ruling provides our state the opportunity to move forward together and focus on getting Wisconsin working again,h Gov. Scott Walker said.

Scott and Jeff Fitzgerald — brothers and Republican leaders in the Legislature — issued a statement describing the ruling as unsurprising. gWe followed the law when the bill was passed, simple as that,h they said.

Democrats said the courtfs decision was unsurprising given a battle that has turned so fierce. Protesters, again, were mounting at the Capitol. Democratic leaders said they planned to remind voters of the collective bargaining bill in the weeks before Senate recall elections that grew out of the fight.

gI guarantee you, some Republicans are breathing a sigh of relief about not having to take this up again,h said Senator Christopher Larson, a Democrat. gOn the other hand, these justices just sent a reminder to voters of what has happened here.h

A version of this article appeared in print on June 15, 2011, on page A14 of the New York edition with the headline: Wisconsin Court Reinstates Law On Union Rights.